Oracle purchased Sun Microsystems, and their Java technologies coupled with it, in 2012. Java has become the preferred products today, which is the reason you see numerous businesses offering Java instructional curriculum for their staff. Oracle charged Google with trademark and patent violation over the use of Java in Android. Google developed Dalvik, which was supposed to be a 'clean room' form of the Java virtual product for their Android platform. Oracle says that even with Dalvik being created from the begining, it still impedes on Java.
The Removed Statement
Groklaw, a site that addresses legal media concerning the open source online community, revealed that Oracle withdrew claim 14 of the patent number 6,192,476. This was actually the final report that was being held onto by Oracle. Because of this now the complete '476 patent isn't under consideration any longer, in terms of this lawsuit is concerned. Additionally, this type of patent and its validity already had a number of question marks regarding it. In 12 , 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office discarded 14 claims of the 21 made by Oracle. This also incorporated all the 7 individual claims. In spite of this patent being removed, there are many other patent infringements alleged by Oracle. If these patents are discovered to be legitimate, they could cost Google millions of dollars.
Google Potential Deficits Minimized
While it's feasible that Google can be found accountable for infringing the patent, the loss it would experience has reduced considerably. When Oracle previously filed the claims, it stated that Google owed them more than $6 billion. By September, the case was knocked down to $2 billion. This had been for the reason that Google had appealed there had been sections of the report that was lacking proper documentation. For Oracle, the initial two claims were taken care of by Lain Cockburn, who is a professor at Boston University. After the 2nd claim was refuted, the judge told Oracle that they ought to take $100 million as the base line and after that move up or down as required. Fortunately, the judgment won't affect corporations employing Java technology, or even institutions presenting Java topics within their Oracle training programs.
The Most Up-to-Date Damage Report by Oracle
Right after the directions from the judge, Cockburn has come up with another report. Google has once again criticized this report for several 'fatal errors'. According to the internet search engine giant, there are a variety of inflated stats and guesswork associated with Cockburn's report. Nevertheless, the report has minimized the assertions drastically and now the patent violation is being worth a maximum figure of $57.1 million and copyright infringement in between $52.4 and $169 million. The intriguing question here is how a $6 billion claim has diminished to roughly $200 million.
The reality is that Oracle went for the tactic of bullying Google through a tall claim. They expected that Google would attempt to wrap things up swiftly. This is turning out quite similar to the infringement case that Microsoft is involved with against Barnes and Noble for the e-reader known as Nook. Hopefully, this will be a lesson for all organizations that are plagued by patent trolls hoping to make some money.
The Removed Statement
Groklaw, a site that addresses legal media concerning the open source online community, revealed that Oracle withdrew claim 14 of the patent number 6,192,476. This was actually the final report that was being held onto by Oracle. Because of this now the complete '476 patent isn't under consideration any longer, in terms of this lawsuit is concerned. Additionally, this type of patent and its validity already had a number of question marks regarding it. In 12 , 2011, the United States Patent and Trademark Office discarded 14 claims of the 21 made by Oracle. This also incorporated all the 7 individual claims. In spite of this patent being removed, there are many other patent infringements alleged by Oracle. If these patents are discovered to be legitimate, they could cost Google millions of dollars.
Google Potential Deficits Minimized
While it's feasible that Google can be found accountable for infringing the patent, the loss it would experience has reduced considerably. When Oracle previously filed the claims, it stated that Google owed them more than $6 billion. By September, the case was knocked down to $2 billion. This had been for the reason that Google had appealed there had been sections of the report that was lacking proper documentation. For Oracle, the initial two claims were taken care of by Lain Cockburn, who is a professor at Boston University. After the 2nd claim was refuted, the judge told Oracle that they ought to take $100 million as the base line and after that move up or down as required. Fortunately, the judgment won't affect corporations employing Java technology, or even institutions presenting Java topics within their Oracle training programs.
The Most Up-to-Date Damage Report by Oracle
Right after the directions from the judge, Cockburn has come up with another report. Google has once again criticized this report for several 'fatal errors'. According to the internet search engine giant, there are a variety of inflated stats and guesswork associated with Cockburn's report. Nevertheless, the report has minimized the assertions drastically and now the patent violation is being worth a maximum figure of $57.1 million and copyright infringement in between $52.4 and $169 million. The intriguing question here is how a $6 billion claim has diminished to roughly $200 million.
The reality is that Oracle went for the tactic of bullying Google through a tall claim. They expected that Google would attempt to wrap things up swiftly. This is turning out quite similar to the infringement case that Microsoft is involved with against Barnes and Noble for the e-reader known as Nook. Hopefully, this will be a lesson for all organizations that are plagued by patent trolls hoping to make some money.
About the Author:
Cedric Fairchild has over 25 years of knowledge as an IT journalist. Click here for more about news in the niche
